Another proposal for modernization of our infrastructure

[Martin Graesslin]

On Saturday 31 January 2015 20:37:31 Christoph Feck wrote:
> On Saturday 31 January 2015 20:07:42 Eike Hein wrote:
> > [...] Qt is using gerrit and we intend to remain a major stakeholde
> > in Qt development, which means a sizable number of KDE developers
> > need to be familiar with gerrit anyway [...]
> 
> Excuse me, but if KDE developers will have to follow equivalent steps
> as described at http://qt-project.org/wiki/Setting-up-Gerrit to
> contribute, then I predict another big loss of developers.

I have to agree. Whenever I need to do a change for Qt I need to google for 
how to do it. Including putting serious thought in how the push command must 
look like, how I need to adjust the examples provided and for which 
ref/for/foo it has to be this time. This is something which seriously concerns 
me with the outlook of gerrit. git has a steep learning curve, gerrit adds 
quite some further steepness to it :-(

Cheers
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20150131/bc3bcd87/attachment.sig>