Review Request 121831: libksysguard: process.h: encapsulate private fields

Dominik Haumann dhaumann at kde.org
Wed Jan 21 10:11:58 GMT 2015



> On Jan. 19, 2015, 6:24 nachm., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > processcore/process.h, line 103
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/diff/2/?file=342813#file342813line103>
> >
> >     Maybe you want to prefix the attribute variables with m_ then?
> 
> Gregor Mi wrote:
>     Thanks for the hint. I will move this member and the ones below it also to the ProcessPrivate class. There the m_ can (should?) be omitted, can't it?

Please dont prefix with m_.
Is is quite common that member variables "m_something" become "d->something" when hidden behind a d-pointer. Having "d->m_" would communicate this twice.


- Dominik


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/#review74353
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 19, 2015, 9:37 nachm., Gregor Mi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 19, 2015, 9:37 nachm.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Base Apps, Dominik Haumann, Eike Hein, and John Tapsell.
> 
> 
> Repository: libksysguard
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> In process.h there are several public fields. I propose to encapsulate the private fields with getter methods. I implemented it exemplary for the fields 'login', 'uid' and 'euid'.
> 
> 
> (In a separate commit I would add the .reviewboardrc file)
> 
> What is the current policy on using small C++ macros as done in this RR? Use it (code is more compact and readable) or don't use it (better for debugging)?
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   .reviewboardrc PRE-CREATION 
>   CMakeLists.txt cefc86f12be684e195bd148641483e9e1734e636 
>   processcore/process.h b6695c0ed301dc5f0fad8ba847da811f19ebfd9a 
>   processcore/process.cpp a38b8be71da1a51cb87f636664ebac817b1d20ab 
>   processcore/processes.cpp 6c0effc903b7792a078e68d2ac6f7ac29dbbcc31 
>   processcore/processes_atop_p.cpp 24c76e3e35f62bd8e9e705ad32cc11cbd3662601 
>   processcore/processes_linux_p.cpp 898d4fa491873fe95a8b32a5c1b85642b2e46ad5 
>   processui/ProcessFilter.cpp ec520593fb67c777d56817f2493d40dc5ade0347 
>   processui/ProcessModel.cpp 53bc041110c9cdb686fef783895104969b661889 
>   processui/ksysguardprocesslist.cpp 4dc142e864d8353ceafc3a6735ffa81e48291420 
>   processui/scripting.h 2445c0ab0d81af3283c0f6e9c5f349a3d70b0de9 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Compiles and runs. Data is still shown. No error.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gregor Mi
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20150121/2504dbb5/attachment.htm>


More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list