Changes to our Git infrastructure

[Boudewijn Rempt]

Well, _obviously_ reviewboard supports raising issues and adding comments 
, but neither facilitates actual conversation, i.e. discussion on what's 
up with a particular patch at a deeper level.

In short, what I meant is that as a tool to dicuss code changes, 
Reviewboard is a poor thing. It facilitates nit-picking, which is 
off-putting and useless, but at least gives the reviewer the feeling he's 
done his job, while it fails at making it easy to discuss the why, 
wherefore and how of a particular change.

On Mon, 5 Jan 2015, Albert Astals Cid wrote:

> El Dilluns, 5 de gener de 2015, a les 18:40:54, Boudewijn Rempt va escriure:
>> I do agree, btw, with Ian, that the current reviewboard workflow is badly
>> broken and can be very discouraging. It doesn't support conversation
>
> What do you mean it doesn't support conversation?
>
> Cheers,
>  Albert
>