Policy regarding QtWebKit and QtScript

[Thomas Lübking]

On Dienstag, 22. Dezember 2015 19:05:23 CEST, Ivan Čukić wrote:

> So, using Kross would mean implementing the kjs backend for it that we
> had in 4.x times?

Isn't the designated successor for QtScript QJSEngine (I even assumed there should be some porting tools?)

About QtWebkit - what exactly does "disappear" mean in this context?
Will it be impossible to link QtWebKit 5.5 to Qt 5.6 ?
For if it would, that would be one giant ABI break and the answer would be to fork Qt... :-P

Cheers,
Thomas