Updating our tools

[Elvis Angelaccio]

Sorry to bump this old thread, but it looks like Krazy still complains
about kdelibs4 errors even if an application is now KF5 based.
For instance consider again Kanagram:
http://ebn.kde.org/krazy/reports/kde-4.x/kdeedu/kanagram/index.html

Am I missing something? Is there another page showing KF5-related issues
for KF5-ready apps?

Cheers,
Elvis

2014-09-28 18:28 GMT+02:00 Allen Winter <winter at kde.org>:

> On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 10:38:37 AM Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> > Allen,
> >
> > Thanks for fixing this, I think it will be a useful tool to check our
> > existing frameworks and code based on frameworks with. I'll update the
> > techbase pages myself.
> >
> The Krazy check for frameworks should be good to go now.
> Please notify me if you find encounter issues no longer relevant in
> Qt5/KDE5.
>
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Allen Winter <winter at kde.org> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 04:15:27 PM Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> > >> Albert,
> > >>
> > >> I can take a look at it if someone points me in the right direction. I
> > >> also found this:
> > >>
> http://ebn.kde.org/krazy/reports/frameworks-5.x/kdelibs/knewstuff/index.html
> > >> which seems to check the right way for frameworks suggestions, but it
> > >> hasn't been ran since Dec of last year :/ and also it calls the
> > >> frameworks kdelibs still (or at least puts it in the url) So it seems
> > >> krazy can handle this new set of suggestions (maybe it could use some
> > >> tweaks though) but hasn't been ran in quite some time. How do I get
> > >> access to run it more often, etc.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Yes that's all on my plate.
> > > I have it on my todo list.
> > > Krazy should be kde5 ready , I just need to plug it in and turn it on.
> > >
> > > I don't recall if there were any blockers, or if I simply got
> distracted on something else.
> > >
> > > The associated changes to the techbase documentation is not on my
> radar.
> > >
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org>
> wrote:
> > >> > El Dimarts, 23 de setembre de 2014, a les 15:56:58, Jeremy Whiting
> va
> > >> > escriure:
> > >> >> Hello all,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Since some of our applications and our workspace will be updated
> for
> > >> >> the next major release (14.12 is the name iirc) to use Qt5 and KDE
> > >> >> Frameworks I thought I would check englishbreakfastnetwork.org
> code
> > >> >> checker of kanagram (which has master branch based on qt5 and kf5).
> > >> >>
> http://ebn.kde.org/krazy/reports/kde-4.x/kdeedu/kanagram/index.html
> > >> >> Some of the "issues" on krazy are old and point to techbase
> articles
> > >> >> suggesting the opposite of the kf5 porting notes, For example,
> krazy
> > >> >> suggests we should use KLineEdit instead of QLineEdit but the
> porting
> > >> >> notes suggest to port from KLineEdit to QLineEdit since KLineEdit
> is
> > >> >> to be deprecated. Maybe I just missed something on ebn, but do we
> need
> > >> >> to add another category there for kf5 based code to be checked in a
> > >> >> different way with different rules, etc.? Shouldn't we update pages
> > >> >> like https://techbase.kde.org/Policies/API_to_Avoid to reflect new
> > >> >> suggestions also I guess or split them to contain suggestions for
> > >> >> kdelibs4 based code vs kf5 based code?
> > >> >
> > >> > We totally should, now who is going to do it ;)
> > >> >
> > >> > Cheers,
> > >> >   Albert
> > >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> thanks,
> > >> >> Jeremy
> > >> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20150808/a514f733/attachment.htm>