<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div>Sorry to bump this old thread, but it looks like Krazy still complains about kdelibs4 errors even if an application is now KF5 based.<br></div>For instance consider again Kanagram: <a href="http://ebn.kde.org/krazy/reports/kde-4.x/kdeedu/kanagram/index.html">http://ebn.kde.org/krazy/reports/kde-4.x/kdeedu/kanagram/index.html</a><br><br></div>Am I missing something? Is there another page showing KF5-related issues for KF5-ready apps?<br><br></div>Cheers,<br></div>Elvis<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-09-28 18:28 GMT+02:00 Allen Winter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:winter@kde.org" target="_blank">winter@kde.org</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 10:38:37 AM Jeremy Whiting wrote:<br>
> Allen,<br>
><br>
> Thanks for fixing this, I think it will be a useful tool to check our<br>
> existing frameworks and code based on frameworks with. I'll update the<br>
> techbase pages myself.<br>
><br>
</span>The Krazy check for frameworks should be good to go now.<br>
Please notify me if you find encounter issues no longer relevant in Qt5/KDE5.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Allen Winter <<a href="mailto:winter@kde.org">winter@kde.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> > On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 04:15:27 PM Jeremy Whiting wrote:<br>
> >> Albert,<br>
> >><br>
> >> I can take a look at it if someone points me in the right direction. I<br>
> >> also found this:<br>
> >> <a href="http://ebn.kde.org/krazy/reports/frameworks-5.x/kdelibs/knewstuff/index.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://ebn.kde.org/krazy/reports/frameworks-5.x/kdelibs/knewstuff/index.html</a><br>
> >> which seems to check the right way for frameworks suggestions, but it<br>
> >> hasn't been ran since Dec of last year :/ and also it calls the<br>
> >> frameworks kdelibs still (or at least puts it in the url) So it seems<br>
> >> krazy can handle this new set of suggestions (maybe it could use some<br>
> >> tweaks though) but hasn't been ran in quite some time. How do I get<br>
> >> access to run it more often, etc.<br>
> >><br>
> ><br>
> > Yes that's all on my plate.<br>
> > I have it on my todo list.<br>
> > Krazy should be kde5 ready , I just need to plug it in and turn it on.<br>
> ><br>
> > I don't recall if there were any blockers, or if I simply got distracted on something else.<br>
> ><br>
> > The associated changes to the techbase documentation is not on my radar.<br>
> ><br>
> >><br>
> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Albert Astals Cid <<a href="mailto:aacid@kde.org">aacid@kde.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> >> > El Dimarts, 23 de setembre de 2014, a les 15:56:58, Jeremy Whiting va<br>
> >> > escriure:<br>
> >> >> Hello all,<br>
> >> >><br>
> >> >> Since some of our applications and our workspace will be updated for<br>
> >> >> the next major release (14.12 is the name iirc) to use Qt5 and KDE<br>
> >> >> Frameworks I thought I would check <a href="http://englishbreakfastnetwork.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">englishbreakfastnetwork.org</a> code<br>
> >> >> checker of kanagram (which has master branch based on qt5 and kf5).<br>
> >> >> <a href="http://ebn.kde.org/krazy/reports/kde-4.x/kdeedu/kanagram/index.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://ebn.kde.org/krazy/reports/kde-4.x/kdeedu/kanagram/index.html</a><br>
> >> >> Some of the "issues" on krazy are old and point to techbase articles<br>
> >> >> suggesting the opposite of the kf5 porting notes, For example, krazy<br>
> >> >> suggests we should use KLineEdit instead of QLineEdit but the porting<br>
> >> >> notes suggest to port from KLineEdit to QLineEdit since KLineEdit is<br>
> >> >> to be deprecated. Maybe I just missed something on ebn, but do we need<br>
> >> >> to add another category there for kf5 based code to be checked in a<br>
> >> >> different way with different rules, etc.? Shouldn't we update pages<br>
> >> >> like <a href="https://techbase.kde.org/Policies/API_to_Avoid" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://techbase.kde.org/Policies/API_to_Avoid</a> to reflect new<br>
> >> >> suggestions also I guess or split them to contain suggestions for<br>
> >> >> kdelibs4 based code vs kf5 based code?<br>
> >> ><br>
> >> > We totally should, now who is going to do it ;)<br>
> >> ><br>
> >> > Cheers,<br>
> >> > Albert<br>
> >> ><br>
> >> >><br>
> >> >> thanks,<br>
> >> >> Jeremy<br>
> >> ><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>