Distros and QtWebEngine

[Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer]

On Tuesday 21 April 2015 09:44:41 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 April 2015 09:39:35 Milian Wolff wrote:
> [snip]
> 
> > > Yes we have, but on the main devel mailing list,
> > > development at qt-project.org
> > > It has been troughly discussed, the thread is actually very long.
> > 
> > When did this take place and what is the threads subject? I seem to have
> > missed it, and also can't find it in my recent mails. Sorry for that.
> 
> Fair enough. One of them starts in [0], but there was another thread in
> which even Lars participated. So far I haven't been able to find it, I'll
> keep trying.
> 
> 
> [0]
> <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2014-November/019333.htm
> l>

Found the other one! The real thread begins in [1] when it was suggested to 
deprecate QtWebkit with 5.5 (which doesn't means dropping). It contains some 
interesting assertions, like Qt Creator people asking for an lightweight 
alternative [2].

Then things get more interesting from the distro-side in [3].

[1] <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2015-February/019893.html>
[2] <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2015-February/019922.html>
[3] <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2015-February/019958.html>

-- 
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20150421/9f2e14c5/attachment.sig>