Strigi usage in KF5 world
Albert Astals Cid
aacid at kde.org
Thu Apr 9 22:00:30 BST 2015
El Dimecres, 8 d'abril de 2015, a les 19:49:37, šumski va escriure:
> On Monday 06 of April 2015 15:26:43 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Diumenge, 5 d'abril de 2015, a les 20:47:03, šumski va escriure:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > In review 120393  it was suggested to remove all code that hasn't
> > > compiled at least since 5.0.0. Nepomuk parts won't work even if the
> > > #if's
> > > would be correctly adjusted, as there isn't Qt5 based soprano, but
> > > strigi
> > > ones in theory should, if the find_package call would be restored. The
> > > libstreams and libstreamanalyzer libs are Qt-agnostic, strigi can only
> > > use Qt for the GUI daemon client.
> > >
> > > Now i got suggestion by Vishesh and Albert to ask for a general decision
> > > regarding strigi-related code.
> > > IMO the code should be killed, as the classes are deprecated even in
> > > kdelibs4 code, so there isn't much point in bringing it all back in
> > > kdelibs4support, even though lxr.kde.org still shows some users...
> > Can you point to the search you made in lxr.kde.org to know how many users
> > are out there to have a better view of what it means removing it
> > altogether?
There's some users, since it is like 2 lines to fix it, i don't see why we
shouldn't just fix it.
> > Cheers,
> > Albert
> > > What do others think?
> > >
> > > : https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120393/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the kde-core-devel