Strigi usage in KF5 world
hrvoje.senjan at gmail.com
Wed Apr 8 18:49:37 BST 2015
On Monday 06 of April 2015 15:26:43 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Diumenge, 5 d'abril de 2015, a les 20:47:03, šumski va escriure:
> > Hi all,
> > In review 120393  it was suggested to remove all code that hasn't
> > compiled at least since 5.0.0. Nepomuk parts won't work even if the #if's
> > would be correctly adjusted, as there isn't Qt5 based soprano, but strigi
> > ones in theory should, if the find_package call would be restored. The
> > libstreams and libstreamanalyzer libs are Qt-agnostic, strigi can only
> > use Qt for the GUI daemon client.
> > Now i got suggestion by Vishesh and Albert to ask for a general decision
> > regarding strigi-related code.
> > IMO the code should be killed, as the classes are deprecated even in
> > kdelibs4 code, so there isn't much point in bringing it all back in
> > kdelibs4support, even though lxr.kde.org still shows some users...
> Can you point to the search you made in lxr.kde.org to know how many users
> are out there to have a better view of what it means removing it
> > What do others think?
> > : https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120393/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the kde-core-devel