Using Gerrit for code review in KDE

[Ivan Čukić]

> my understanding was that it's still possible to bypass the code review, so
> I cannot see that it's against the KDE Manifesto as it's only a kind of
> social contract. Or am I missing something.
> 
> Personally I like the idea of having the +2 limited to the devs familiar
> with the code.

I agree, +2 should be retained by the maintainer, or a smaller set of 
developers as decided by the maintainer.

As for submitting, that might not be a necessary requirement (though I'm not 
against trying it out) - we are a well behaved bunch usually - I don't think 
anyone would actually commit something that has not passed review.

Cheers,
Ivan

-- 
KDE, ivan.cukic at kde.org, http://ivan.fomentgroup.org/
gpg key id: 850B6F76, keyserver.pgp.com