Review Request 117157: Unlock session via DBus

[Thomas Lübking]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117157/#review54536
-----------------------------------------------------------


what is the valid (read: not malicious) usecase for this?

i'd rather say that if quitting the greeter to exit the lock w/o password, that should be fixed to *not* exit the lock w/o password provision.

- Thomas Lübking


On March 29, 2014, 11:58 a.m., Kirill Elagin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117157/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 29, 2014, 11:58 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kde-workspace.
> 
> 
> Bugs: 314989
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314989
> 
> 
> Repository: kde-workspace
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Unlock session via DBus
> 
> Make org.freedesktop.ScreenSaver.SetActive(false) unlock session.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   plasma-workspace/ksmserver/screenlocker/interface.cpp ecb30a37b1a207cf9dab8c53b1b879108a99a45b 
>   plasma-workspace/ksmserver/screenlocker/ksldapp.h b292b62f4df073fff31bcbfd0e39f4c4fe04c92d 
>   plasma-workspace/ksmserver/screenlocker/ksldapp.cpp f2e5262524447e8ae1df1fbf6543297c3be3e6b8 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117157/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I've tested this with KDE 4.11.5 which I'm currently running.
> Rebasing to master was completely trivial; I've looked through the code and I believe all the assumptions I made are still valid in master.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kirill Elagin
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20140329/b50d45c3/attachment.htm>