Kronometer now in KDE Review

[David Faure]

On Thursday 19 June 2014 17:07:49 Elvis Angelaccio wrote:
> 2014-06-18 18:50 GMT+02:00 David Faure <faure at kde.org>:
> > On Wednesday 18 June 2014 16:27:43 Elvis Angelaccio wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > in the last two months this thread has not been updated, so I assume
> > > that
> > > the Kronometer UI is ok.
> > > What is still not clear is whether to move Kronometer in extragear-utils
> > 
> > or
> > 
> > > kdeutils and until this decision is not reached I can't file a sysadmin
> > > request to exit from kdereview.
> > > 
> > > At the moment, in this thread there is one "vote" for extragear-utils by
> > > Albert and one for kdeutils by David.
> > > There is another thread in kde-utils-devel list where there is another
> > 
> > vote
> > 
> > > for extragear-utils:
> > > https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-utils-devel/2014-April/001110.html
> > 
> > I don't mind either way, it makes very little difference in the end
> > ("sudo zypper install kronometer", done)
> > 
> > In fact the real question is what do *you* want: do you want it released
> > automatically as part of the KDE SC, or do you want to make your own
> > releases
> > (more work for you, but you control when it's released).
> 
> Well, what I really care for is packaging and translations, the release
> schedule is secondary.

It's not just about schedule, it's about who does the work.

> I'm not sure how exactly extragear works. Let's say I choose to move
> kronometer in extragear-utils: the many distros will automatically package
> it? 

Yes, that's not where the difference is.

> What about translations?

No difference there either.

The difference is: will you take care of doing regular releases of the code 
(versionning, packaging, uploading, etc. etc.). Or would you rather that this 
happens automatically for you whenever a KDE SC release comes out.

-- 
David Faure, faure at kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on KDE Frameworks 5