[Kde-pim] Problems with infrastructure

Albert Astals Cid aacid at kde.org
Fri Dec 12 21:44:39 GMT 2014

El Divendres, 12 de desembre de 2014, a les 01:16:14, Jan Kundrát va escriure:
> On Thursday, 11 December 2014 23:20:59 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > You need to understand understand though that changing patch
> > review systems is
> > not your decision to take (nor mine), we need to have a general
> > agreement/consensus when changing systems as important.
> Changing systems is not what I propose, though. What I'm arguing for is
> empowering the individual projects to be able to choose tools which work
> well for them. 

That is something bad, where you see empowering i see needless fragmentation. 
We need to move together otherwise things will get harder and harder to 

> That's very different from saying "whole KDE should just
> switch to Gerrit", and I'm not proposing that. Some people have made
> themselves clear that no change is going to happen, and I can live with
> that.

Where was that discussed? Which people is that?


> I do happen to think that yes, switching to Gerrit would in fact indeed be
> a good move for KDE as a whole, but sharing a view is something else than
> making people change their systems. If you like RB and you're a project
> maintainer, sure, by all means do use it for your projects -- I'm not going
> to force you to switch for the sake of my pleasure or something similar.
> I also admit that I would probably feel a little bit sad if Trojita ended
> up to be the only project which sticked with Gerrit, but if that was the
> general consensus of the community, who am I to dispute the wishes of
> poeple doing the actual work?
> I'm sorry if the impression which I managed to create by pointing out what
> I perceive to be strong points of Gerrit and weak points of the
> alternatives was something different.
> With kind regards,
> Jan

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list