DrKonqi improvement idea

[Niko Sams]

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 09:54, Milian Wolff <mail at milianw.de> wrote:
> On Monday 12 March 2012 02:14:00 Teemu Rytilahti wrote:
>> - When getting duplicate backtraces from users the bug entry
>> could be
>> updated automatically with the version the crash happened,
>> this would in my
>> opinion be a plus in a sense that "can reproduce in version x"
>> entries
>> wouldn't flood the comment section. Anyway, this is something
>> which could be
>> generally available for all bugs...
>
> I don't get how this is valuable feedback. If I didn't fix a bug of course it
> will be reproducible in later versions?!
yeah, those people commenting  after every release that the bug is
still not (magically) fixed :D

>> - Is there a need to keep duplicate crashes in the database,
>> maybe for false
>> positives?
>
> hu? I don't get this one. if it's a duplicate then by definition one doesn't
> need its information because it's already known?!
I would store all crashes, also duplicates
- maybe it's a false positive (that's what Teemu is talking about I think)
- it's an important fact to see how common a crash is

Niko