kdelibs and Qt version dependency

Martin Gräßlin mgraesslin at kde.org
Wed Jun 6 23:04:06 BST 2012

On Wednesday 06 June 2012 20:32:49 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> But I'm expecting more people to have an opinion on this. David? Sebas?
> Someone from plasma?
in the initial thread I was in favor of going for Qt 4.8, but I accepted the 
opinion of the majority. I would consider it as a bad incident if you get your 
update to Qt 4.8 by breaking the code.

The main argument for sticking with Qt 4.7 was if I recall correctly that 
Harmattan will not update to Qt 4.8. I guess that this has not changed and if 
it was a good enough argument in January, it should be in June.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20120607/4e440935/attachment.sig>

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list