rekonq 2 merged in rekonq main repository

[andrea diamantini]

Yes, I'm obviously trying.
My first attempt was a tiny change in the KCookieServer/KCookieJar API to
let people search just for persistent cookies.
But it failed.
I'm currently working on a second attempt following the same approach. If
not, I though about implementing a different jar for the private sessions.
But this second idea is probably an "hard" change in the kde cookie jar.
I fear that "private sessions" are exactly the opposite idea around what
the "monolithic" & "share it with every app" kde cookie jar is builded.


2012/12/17 David Faure <faure-RoXCvvDuEio at public.gmane.org>

> On Sunday 16 December 2012 18:41:31 andrea diamantini wrote:
> > - New private browsing mode (NOT based on KIO, as it seems our cookiejar
> is
> > not enough "malleable" for it. At least in kde4)
>
> Are you working on patches to make it "malleable" enough in the future?
>
> If you need something, make it happen, don't just hope for others to do so
> :)
>
> --
> David Faure, faure-RoXCvvDuEio at public.gmane.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
> Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5
>
>


-- 

Andrea Diamantini
WEB: http://www.adjam.org

rekonq project
WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org
IRC: rekonq at freenode
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20121218/8764e53d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
rekonq mailing list
rekonq-RoXCvvDuEio at public.gmane.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/rekonq