Nepomuk code moved to nepomuk-core

[Kevin Ottens]

On Thursday 15 September 2011 17:44:20 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Does that mean that nepomuk should be removed from the frameworks branch? I
> had a look, and I'm not sure if the history is kept etc.

In any case I wouldn't remove it, from the Frameworks effort POV it just means 
we don't have to bother about Nepomuk. Either way we shouldn't remove it from 
the kdelibs repo because if the new repo got done properly the plan was to use 
git grafts to get the full history for the splitted repos, and if wasn't done 
properly, then it's likely that the nepomuk lords will be happy to find the 
old history from the kdelibs repo somehow.
 
> Removing it from frameworks would mean that it doesn't get updated as things
> change, but changing nepomuk things in the frameworks branch wouldn't be
> mergable anyway.

I'd say we should just comment it out from the build right away (depends how 
many other libs depend on it though).
 
Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20110915/a6423b92/attachment.sig>