[proposal] KSecretsService components moving from playground

[Martin Koller]

On Wednesday, 12. October 2011 01:09:51 Valentin Rusu wrote:

> > I personally have been looking forward to KSecretsService and I like
> > the idea of leaving KSecretsService unused by default for now, but it
> > should at least be stressed to downstream to leave it off by default
> > and why you chose it to be off for this release, if you do decide to
> > implement it for 4.8. I assume there is a reason you decided to leave
> > it off by default?
> Yes, I decided that precisely to avoid pitfalls I saw when KDE 4 
> arrived. Let's put the code in for 4.8, voluntarily test it by 
> voluntarily checking that box, then put it on by default with the next 
> 2012 release.

What about adding a "warning" text at the checkbox, e.g. "(experimental)"
like with Linux kernel drivers when configuring
which makes the status clear and brave people only will try to activate it ?

-- 
Best regards/Schöne Grüße

Martin
A: Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q: Why is top posting bad?

()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail 
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

Geschenkideen, Accessoires, Seifen, Kulinarisches: www.bibibest.at
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20111013/8f037f3f/attachment.sig>