Screensaver to be or not to be (was: Re: Security Audit Request for Screenlocker Branch)

[Torgny Nyblom]

On Tuesday 11 October 2011 21.11.03 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 October 2011 20:12:39 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
[...]
> > But you also said that the screensaver without locking was going away in
> > 4.9. This is what I'm against.
> 
> As Thomas wrote you will always be able to run any animations you want. What
> will go away is the support for xscreensavers when the screen is locked.
> But we will make it possible to integrate QML based screensavers into the
> screen locker.

Then all my objections are gone. Thanks for the clarification.

/Regards
Torgny