Security Audit Request for Screenlocker Branch

[Martin Gräßlin]

On Monday 10 October 2011 20:02:07 Parker Coates wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 14:02, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > I want to request a security audit for the changes to ensure that the new
> > implementation is as secure as the existing one and that I did not forget
> > an important case which would compromise the security.
> > 
> > The general concept of the new screenlocker is described in the wiki:
> > http://community.kde.org/KWin/Screenlocker
> > 
> >> Screensavers without Locking
> >> No valid use case: should no longer be supported.
> 
> Could you elaborate on this part? What is meant by "screensavers
> without locking"?
Just running the screen saver animation without locking the screen. That is 
moving the mouse deactivates the screensaver without asking for a password. 
Does that make it clear?

Cheers
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20111011/315e7c68/attachment.sig>