Security Audit Request for Screenlocker Branch

[Parker Coates]

On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 14:02, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> I want to request a security audit for the changes to ensure that the new
> implementation is as secure as the existing one and that I did not forget an
> important case which would compromise the security.
>
> The general concept of the new screenlocker is described in the wiki:
> http://community.kde.org/KWin/Screenlocker
>
>> Screensavers without Locking
>> No valid use case: should no longer be supported.

Could you elaborate on this part? What is meant by "screensavers
without locking"?

Thanks,

Parker