Frameworks mailing list

Andras Mantia amantia at
Thu Nov 17 18:26:28 GMT 2011

On Thursday, November 17, 2011 18:17:30 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > i was not sure i agreed with that approach, but i have to say that
> > the last few threads on this topic on k-c-d have supported their
> > point :(
> I would draw exactly the opposite conclusion.
> If the signal to noise ratio here is considered too low, then having
> the KF5 discussions here
> * would have increased the signal, and thereby increased the SNR
> * IMO would also have decreased the feeled need for the lengthy
> discussions taking place now, since people would feel better
> informed, which would decrease the noise, thereby increasing the SNR
> Seriously, IMO it's a "bug" if the core KDE developers don't use
> kde-core- devel for communication.

 Exactly. Frameworks is the *core* of KDE. What is kde-core-devel then?
> P.S. from my POV, I'm not sure using kde-core-devel for the
> reviewboard mails is really necessary

This is questionable, as those mails are about kdelibs patches, no? 
Think about those as what they are: contributions to kdelibs that need a 
discussion. Like in the old days, when you'd post a patch to a mailing 


More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list