4.6 branches created in git again
schwarzerf at gmail.com
Tue Mar 22 15:07:16 GMT 2011
On 22/03/2011, Ian Monroe <ian at monroe.nu> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 18:13, Alex Merry <kde at randomguy3.me.uk> wrote:
>> On 21/03/11 20:17, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>>> On Monday 21 March 2011, Ian Monroe wrote:
>>>> Ben did add this block to his hook. Hooray. :)
>>>> I'm thinking I should just go ahead and rename KDE/4.6 to 4.6 etc.
>>> Wasn't the conclusion more like going with the longer name, i.e. KDE/4.6
>> That's what I understood from the earlier discussion...
> I get why people like the prefix in theory, since I mean that's why I
> left it there. It looks nice.
>From what I understand the problem, it's not a like/dislike question
but a real problem if an application has its own version numbers and
reaches e.g. version 4.6.
> But in practice its obviously just been confusing. Even now that
> creating 4.6 is blocked, that just means its blocked and we won't
> notice when people struggle.
Can the hook not give a message pointing to some Wiki page that
explains the issue?
More information about the kde-core-devel