QZeitgeist and Phonon

[todd rme]

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Sebastian Trüg <trueg at kde.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 03/08/2011 09:53 AM, Ivan Cukic wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> First of all, one thing to mention - KDE apps are not advised to use
>> QtZeitgeist directly because that way the 'tracking' has no idea about the
>> activities.
>>
>> File/resource tracking (and thus rating) should be per activity - as an
>> example, there is no point in showing java docs that you used in
>> 'Developing J2EE application' activity in a 'KDE development activity'.
>>
>> The classes that should be used are KActivity* which will soon enter
>> kdelibs/experimental.
>>
>> The activity manager (the dbus service behind KActivity classes) will have
>> both Zeitgeist and Nepomuk as backends. (both as optional deps)
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Zeitgeist vs Nepomuk
>>
>> Sebastian concluded that storing all the events in Nepomuk wouldn't be
>> wise, so it was agreed to store them in Zeitgeist which was designed with
>> that sole purpose.
>
> to be precise: I wanted to test storing all in Nepomuk first which I
> have not done yet.

Does this mean you would want to give nepomuk this capability if the
tests are successful?

-Todd