QZeitgeist and Phonon

todd rme toddrme2178 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 8 19:58:53 GMT 2011

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Sebastian TrĂ¼g <trueg at kde.org> wrote:
> On 03/08/2011 09:53 AM, Ivan Cukic wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> First of all, one thing to mention - KDE apps are not advised to use
>> QtZeitgeist directly because that way the 'tracking' has no idea about the
>> activities.
>> File/resource tracking (and thus rating) should be per activity - as an
>> example, there is no point in showing java docs that you used in
>> 'Developing J2EE application' activity in a 'KDE development activity'.
>> The classes that should be used are KActivity* which will soon enter
>> kdelibs/experimental.
>> The activity manager (the dbus service behind KActivity classes) will have
>> both Zeitgeist and Nepomuk as backends. (both as optional deps)
>> ---
>> Zeitgeist vs Nepomuk
>> Sebastian concluded that storing all the events in Nepomuk wouldn't be
>> wise, so it was agreed to store them in Zeitgeist which was designed with
>> that sole purpose.
> to be precise: I wanted to test storing all in Nepomuk first which I
> have not done yet.

Does this mean you would want to give nepomuk this capability if the
tests are successful?


More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list