QZeitgeist and Phonon
trueg at kde.org
Tue Mar 8 10:57:28 GMT 2011
On 03/08/2011 09:53 AM, Ivan Cukic wrote:
> Hi all,
> First of all, one thing to mention - KDE apps are not advised to use
> QtZeitgeist directly because that way the 'tracking' has no idea about the
> File/resource tracking (and thus rating) should be per activity - as an
> example, there is no point in showing java docs that you used in
> 'Developing J2EE application' activity in a 'KDE development activity'.
> The classes that should be used are KActivity* which will soon enter
> The activity manager (the dbus service behind KActivity classes) will have
> both Zeitgeist and Nepomuk as backends. (both as optional deps)
> Zeitgeist vs Nepomuk
> Sebastian concluded that storing all the events in Nepomuk wouldn't be
> wise, so it was agreed to store them in Zeitgeist which was designed with
> that sole purpose.
to be precise: I wanted to test storing all in Nepomuk first which I
have not done yet.
> My current intention is the following (for the activity manager)
> - Store all events in Zeitgeist making it possible to have more advanced
> queries like 'files opened last week between tue and sat in the
> - Store only per-activity scores in nepomuk making it possible to have
> 'which are the most common files opened in kate during some activity'
how do you do that?
> After this, we can do all kinds of magic even if not both Z and N are
More information about the kde-core-devel