Intended organization of KDE Frameworks

[Albert Astals Cid]

A Tuesday, June 07, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
> On Tuesday 7 June 2011 00:17:23 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > A Monday, June 06, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
> > > Hello lists,
> > > 
> > > Throughout this example we will refer to the following graph:
> > > http://files.kde.org/ervin/platform11/kde-frameworks-dependencies-plan.
> > > pd f
> > 
> > Shall i read from this graph that we will not be providing translation
> > support for solid, date and time, kauth, kgui and kwidgets (since it
> > would mean a T1 component depending on another T1 component)?
> 
> Well, obviously a Tier 1 framework would have to use tr() instead of i18n()
> for its translation needs. 

Are we still going to use .po or you plan on us moving to Qt translation 
files?

> AFAIK that shouldn't be a big issue as libsolid
> is already in that situation. 

Yeah, and totally fails to follow KLocale setting of wheter to use KB, KiB, 
etc.

> We're aware that our own translation system
> provides more feature, but at the level of Tier 1 frameworks the user
> messages should be simple enough to get away with using tr().

I disagree, time and date formatting is anything but simple.

Albert

> 
> Regards.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20110607/896064e5/attachment.htm>