Intended organization of KDE Frameworks

[Kevin Ottens]

On Tuesday 7 June 2011 00:17:23 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Monday, June 06, 2011, Kevin Ottens va escriure:
> > Hello lists,
> > 
> > Throughout this example we will refer to the following graph:
> > http://files.kde.org/ervin/platform11/kde-frameworks-dependencies-plan.pd
> > f
> 
> Shall i read from this graph that we will not be providing translation
> support for solid, date and time, kauth, kgui and kwidgets (since it
> would mean a T1 component depending on another T1 component)?

Well, obviously a Tier 1 framework would have to use tr() instead of i18n() 
for its translation needs. AFAIK that shouldn't be a big issue as libsolid is 
already in that situation. We're aware that our own translation system 
provides more feature, but at the level of Tier 1 frameworks the user messages 
should be simple enough to get away with using tr().

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20110607/3ecdd66b/attachment.sig>