Usefulness of Subject-header of git commit mails

[Milian Wolff]

Eike Hein, 23.01.2011:
> > @sysadmins: would it be possible to change the format for some repos or
> > is this not possible? I.e. leave the decision to the project
> > maintainers?
> 
> Would you be OK with this hybrid format that we discussed a few
> days ago:
> 
> [<repo sans git>/<branch>*] <common root path>: <commit subject>
> 
> * branch only shown if != master.
> 
> If we could agree on a hybrid, IMHO that'd be a better solution
> than having different formats in play. It's technically possible
> to make it configurable, but people who subscribe to multiple
> repositories with different formats might get irked by it, it
> might make writing filter rules for some more complex, etc.

Yes, it's perfect. Thank you! And as I said - if someone would have ping'ed me 
on IRC so that I could have read it there, I wouldn't have started this thread 
at all.

bye

-- 
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20110123/4413c2a4/attachment.sig>