KShutdown got to kde-runtime without review

Marco Martin notmart at gmail.com
Mon Feb 21 10:56:38 GMT 2011

On Monday 21 February 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Diumenge, 20 de febrer de 2011, Marco Martin va escriure:
> > On Wednesday 16 February 2011, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > Why?
> > > 
> > > Albert
> > 
> > Speaking of which, what is the policy now?
> > I have in a branch of kdelibs a little library that should go into
> > experimental/ (probably staying there for 4.7)
> > 
> > now that there isn't anymore the kdereview svn repo, how this things get
> > reviewed?
> We still have https://projects.kde.org/projects/kdereview but i understand
> that only works for separate repos.
> > just announcing here that there is the plasma/declarative branch in
> > kdelibs that should be merged?
> That'd be enough for me but it is not me that sets the rules :D

well, that one in particular could in theory still be pulled in a separate 
repository, other parts (libplasma at the moment) still don't depend from it 
but i really have to make it depend soon...
this is still quite independent, but i guess in the future there will be 
plenty of big branches that really couldn't be pulled in a separate repo

what about a wiki page that lists branches big enough that need a review?

Marco Martin

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list