Review Request: the soprano-depency for kdelibs ist not correct
Sebastian Trueg
trueg at kde.org
Thu Sep 16 09:50:30 BST 2010
> On 2010-09-15 13:15:29, Sebastian Trueg wrote:
> > Why does kdelibs need Soprano 2.5.63. It might very well be that I missed something but where is the new functionality needed?
>
> Guy Maurel wrote:
> OK, it is not exact enought!
> types/entity.cpp: else if ( property == Soprano::Vocabulary::NAO::userVisible() ) {
>
> entity.cpp needs userVisible from soprano/nao.h
>
> Guy Maurel wrote:
> It seems to be more complicated as I thought.
> I have a soprano-version: 2.5.2. Too less!
> But the CMake doesn't complain.
> If I comment out the lines around
> set(SOPRANO_MIN_VERSION "1.99")
> in the file cmake/modules/FindSoprano.cmake
> I get the wished information about the OPTIONAL package ... Soprano (2.5.60 or higher)
Is this a clean build?
- Sebastian
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5360/#review7617
-----------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-09-15 12:26:42, Guy Maurel wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5360/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2010-09-15 12:26:42)
>
>
> Review request for kdelibs.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> the needed depency is 2.5.63, not 2.5.60
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/CMakeLists.txt 1175580
>
> Diff: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5360/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Guy
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20100916/05cedc45/attachment.htm>
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list