Review Request: Adding "net usershare" suport for KSambaShare
David Faure
faure at kde.org
Mon Nov 15 21:49:36 GMT 2010
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/4320/#review8750
-----------------------------------------------------------
/trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/ksambashare.h
<http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/4320/#comment9339>
Documentation?
Ownership of the returned pointer? ==> another reason to return a value instead.
/trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/ksambashare.h
<http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/4320/#comment9340>
Why did you move away from Q_PRIVATE_SLOT? This looks like a step in the wrong direction.
/trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/ksambashare.cpp
<http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/4320/#comment9333>
Please keep the original solution of static const char* const ... []. It made the data really-const (.rodata section), i.e. shared between processes and not relocated in memory.
/trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/ksambashare.cpp
<http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/4320/#comment9334>
To keep the C++ code maintainable and modular, please declare and use variables in the same line, e.g.
QString rawString = testparmParamValue(...);
Then you can even make it const to indicate that it's not modified anywhere in the method.
const QString rawString = testparmParamValue(...);
("parmParam? That's a bit difficult to read, don't both words mean "parameter"?)
/trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/ksambashare.cpp
<http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/4320/#comment9337>
It seems to me that this "new KSambaShareData" instance is leaked, in the destructor. Why not use this by value, given that you made it a nice value-based class?
In this case the code would look like
KSambaShareData& shareData = data[currentShare]; // find or insert
shareData.setName(currentShare);
...
/trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/ksambashare.cpp
<http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/4320/#comment9335>
const QString key = ...
const QString value = ...
- David
On 2010-11-14 22:48:05, Rodrigo Belem wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/4320/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2010-11-14 22:48:05)
>
>
> Review request for kdelibs, Raphael Kubo da Costa, Jonathan Thomas, Aurélien Gâteau, Jonathan Riddell, Adenilson Cavalcanti, loureiro, and Daniel Nicoletti.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> KDE needs to support modern samba tools. With the "net usershare" command line tool the users can manage their shares. The attached patch intends to add support for this tool.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/includes/CMakeLists.txt 1180108
> /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/CMakeLists.txt 1180108
> /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/ksambashare.h 1180108
> /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/ksambashare.cpp 1180108
> /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/ksambashare_p.h PRE-CREATION
> /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/ksambasharedata.h PRE-CREATION
> /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/ksambasharedata.cpp PRE-CREATION
> /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/kio/kio/ksambasharedata_p.h PRE-CREATION
>
> Diff: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/4320/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rodrigo
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20101115/bcbe5214/attachment.htm>
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list