Git Migration Needs YOU!

[Chani]

On March 2, 2010 08:09:30 Tom Albers wrote:
> Op Tuesday 2 March 2010 16:37 schreef u:
> > while there are certainly those who
> > aren't in favor of a move to git, it's pretty clear there is a good
> > amount of consensus on the matter.
> 
> Really? Does that also include translators? I know they will be using svn,
> but as time moves on, sooner or later they will have to move too. And then
> they won't have an option by then, so they need to be involved now too.
> 

the reason you haven't heard anything about i18n is that it's been working 
smoothly with amarok's git repo for about 6 months already. :)

I worked closely with the translators last summer (*before* akademy) to make 
scripty git-compatible.
they were generally happy with their svn workflow, and didn't want it to be 
disturbed. so we're not going to disturb them.
if the translators want to join us later, I'll be quite happy to help them 
with that, but I'm not going to try and force them into anything.

-- 
This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3.
www.chani3.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20100302/d9ebc093/attachment.sig>