Git Migration Needs YOU!
toma at kde.org
Tue Mar 2 14:40:02 GMT 2010
Op Tuesday 2 March 2010 15:26 schreef u:
> On March 2, 2010 02:09:32 Tom Albers wrote:
> > Op Tuesday 2 March 2010 03:24 schreef u:
> > > > 2.4 Push log: a nice to have, but not a blocker afaics
> > >
> > > it's an accountability thing... although if we self-hosted it'd be
> > > another nonissue afaik.
> > >
> > > > 2.5 pre-receive hooks: if we self host, easy to solve. if we go with
> > > > gitorious.org, is it really a blocker?
> > >
> > > ...
> > > probably not? I guess someone committing something with bad encoding or
> > > windows line endings isn't the end of the world. :)
> > If this includes our acl setup it is still a blocker.
> > Toma
> iirc, the acls are only needed for the website stuff, which is staying in svn
> for now, thereby avoiding the problem :)
Nope. The certificate stuff is shielded.
Also tags/KDE is shielded.
Also build specific files are rejected.
How is the changelog going to be handled? Website, means in svn? So people working on de main kde modules, still need two tools?
More information about the kde-core-devel