Inclusion of simon in kde-accessibility

[Sebastian Kügler]

On Wednesday 21 July 2010 10:59:44 Peter Grasch wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 July 2010 09:41:24 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> > Now Peter asked if the review could start already. I'm not sure about
> > that. Hasn't this happened before, that someone put a note where to find
> > the to- be-reviewed app into kdereview instead of cloning the sources?
> > If I recall correctly for rekonq the situation was/is similar.
> > So would this be acceptable in this special situation?
> > I know we have our rules. On the other hand, sometimes we need to
> > accommodate reality ;)
> 
> Thanks for the uplifting words :)
> 
> At this point I just want to point out again that keeping a copy of the
> sources on the kdereview SVN wouldn't really be a problem imho if it were
> just for the period of the review.
> 
> I am the only active developer on the codebase on sf anyways and syncing my
> changes wouldn't really be an issue for me.

I think that's a fine solution: Put Simon into kdereview, announce it on k-c-d 
(this list :)), and have it reviewed. Then, when the review is done, wait for 
git.kde.org to become open and move it there.
-- 
sebas

http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9