Rekonq default

Alex Fiestas alex at
Sat Feb 20 16:23:55 GMT 2010

On Saturday 20 February 2010 17:04:23 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> that said, and despite the fact that i really like rekonq's direction, it
> is not anywhere near ready for widespread deployment imho. there is a good
> amount of core functionality (like address bar handling when connected via
> https) as well as polishing needed (e.g. the status bar replacement is a
> good idea, but it uses KPassivePopup to do so when it really should be a
> floating QWidget inside the window itself, among many other similar
> issues)
I totally agree with that, rekonq is in the right path, but it has a loong way 
to walk

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list