Rekonq default

Albert Astals Cid aacid at
Sat Feb 20 15:47:10 GMT 2010

A Dissabte, 20 de febrer de 2010, Arno Rehn va escriure:
> On Saturday 20 February 2010 16:13:48 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > A Dissabte, 20 de febrer de 2010, Frank Karlitschek va escriure:
> > > hi friends,
> > > 
> > > some snip
> > > 
> > > So rekonq is a better browser for 80% of our users and should be
> > > default therefore.
> > 
> > Don't throw a percentage making it seem you did some real research. That
> > number is a plain lie since you have no idea wheter is better or not to
> > our users since you have no idea of how many and what kind of users we
> > have.
> > 
> > Obvious question from my side is:
> >  * Can rekonq embedd the okular part when the web page has embedded pdf
> > 
> > files?
> Quite honestly, I don't think most users really care about that. They
> didn't care when Dolphin was made the default filemanager (which can't
> embed kparts, too) and most of them don't care that Firefox can't embed
> kparts.

So you don't care about users not being able to see web pages with pdf in 
them? Wow :D

Note i am NOT speaking of opening a pdf in konqueror but opening a web page 
that hsa pdf INSIDE like


> I, personally, do care and that's why I neither use Dolphin nor rekonq. The
> ability of konqueror to do just EVERYTHING, from displaying webpages,
> pictures, source code files with nice highlighting, manage my files and
> simultaniously browse my webspace via ftp is just the definitive killer
> feature for me.
> But most of the users are probably simply using dolphin, despite it not
> being able to use kparts, and I bet they wouldn't mind using rekonq
> instead of konqueror.
> +1 for the move, as long as konqueror won't be treated like a step child
> afterwards-

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list