KICONLOADER_CHECKS still necessary?

[Michael Pyne]

On Wednesday 16 September 2009 02:02:42 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> I'm wondering whether this define is still needed. According to the
>  comments, was created to detect bugs like #68528 -- but isn't a unittest
>  more appropriate than executing all this overhead for everyone who closes
>  a KDE application?
> 

kBacktrace run on /every/ shutdown?  I say remove it and then backport the 
removal. :P

Regards,
 - Michael Pyne
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20090916/77d0d536/attachment.sig>