Choosing the qt tree to file merge requests

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On September 12, 2009, Christoph Feck wrote:
> On Saturday 12 September 2009 13:23:17 Tom Albers wrote:
> > Op Saturday 12 September 2009 03:15 schreef u:
> > > There's been some discussion about making KDE 4.4 depend on Qt 4.6,
> > > but I didn't see any consensus.
> >
> > There is imho consensus: we will depend on it.
> 
> Not sure how upgrading Qt was handled before, but would it make sense to
>  sync "qt-copy" with Qt 4.6 tp1 so that we can start giving feedback to
>  Nokia? Maybe not requiring it right now, but some kind of "mass regression
>  test".

i would personally appreciate this. it will give us more time to get Qt 4.6 
testing done and we already have some patches waiting for Qt 4.6 to land, at 
least one of which fixes a bug in trunk.
  
> Running trunk with 4.6 right now (there are some post-4.6 tp1 regressions
>  in QtGui, but tp1 should work fine).

i think it probably makes sense to keep kde-qt sync'd to tagged milestones 
rather than track the day-to-day bleeding edge. people who want that can get 
it easily enough. :)

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20090912/d2384943/attachment.sig>