Merging KAuth into KDELibs

Dario Freddi drf54321 at gmail.com
Sat Sep 5 13:52:05 BST 2009


In data sabato 05 settembre 2009 14:36:47, Oswald Buddenhagen ha scritto:
: > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 01:53:19PM +0200, Dario Freddi wrote:
> > time is now mature to merge the brand new KAuth into kdelibs.
> 
> i find the choice of the name unfortunate, given the existence of the
> KAuthorized class; this is bound to cause confusion. try something like
> KPrivileged, KPoliced, KElevated ... whatever.
> 
> and on a general note, i *urge* you to think through the issues of
> integrating with existing related technologies *before* you push this
> stuff. you have a track record of ignoring prior art and causing a lot
> of grief for everyone.

Wrong, if you please. I think reviewing stuff with 15 developers in person 
could suffice. Or do I have a track record on non waiting for your review? 
KAuth is in kdereview since July. You look you have more a problem on timing, 
I followed the policies more than enough. And this is your problem, not mine.

Also, what issue did I not think through? If you looked into the code, you 
would have realized that KAuth lies in a separate namespace, so it's quite 
unlikely to have stuff conflicting with KAuthorized, which has a completely 
different scope and functionality.

> 

-- 
-------------------

Dario Freddi
KDE Developer
GPG Key Signature: 511A9A3B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20090905/7e9e039b/attachment.sig>


More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list