situation with window decorations

[Matthew Woehlke]

Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On August 27, 2009, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>> The UI definitely needs work. Oh, and for button style, it should be
>> "sunken" (<- "default"), "flush" (<- "KDE 4.2") and "raised" (as in KDE
>> 4.1)... I want my original buttons back :-).
> 
> isn't this why we have the ability to have different window decorations? in 
> any case, please think very carefully about whether such fine grained changes 
> matter. i would humbly submit that the visual difference between sunken and 
> flush, at least as currently implemented, is really not worth an option.
> 
> pick a way and go for it :)

If you're going to have it configurable, why /not/ raised? But I can 
also live with dropping the configuration entirely. I just feel "if it's 
configurable anyway..."

-- 
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
   -- Unknown/Anonymous