Nepomuk as hard dependency in future?

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On October 17, 2009, George Kiagiadakis wrote:
> I don't see why this is not an option. Of course it would be BIC, but
> that is what we have now as well. If you build for example dolphin
> with nepomuk support and try to link it to a kdelibs version that
> doesn't have nepomuk, it will fail. 

the goal should be to limit such situations, not accept them with a shrug of 
the shoulders. :)

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20091019/f53031df/attachment.sig>