Nepomuk as hard dependency in future?

[Tom Albers]

Op Saturday 17 October 2009 16:30 schreef u:
> On Saturday 17 October 2009 6:19:58 am Peter Penz wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > currently Nepomuk is an optional dependency. 
> 
> I asked the same question about Soprano a couple months ago.
> 
> The summary of that thread was basically: not until virtuoso is ready.
> Quoting Richard Dale "Until we have a reliable version of OpenLink Virtuoso
> that has 
> its packaging and SPARQL problems fixed, I don't think we should make Soprano
> a hard dependency."
> 
> We cannot make nepomuk in kdelibs a hard dependency until we also make Soprano
> a hard dependency.

Since kdepim is a depnding on nepomuk and rumors are that Virtuoso starts to get ready or is already ready for prime time, I think it makes sense to depend on it in kdebase too.. But I'm a bit biased ;-)

Toma
-- 
KDE Developer