RFC: remove qt-copy

[Helio Chissini de Castro]

Helio Chissini de Castro escreveu:
> Olivier Goffart escreveu:
>> Le Mandag 25 mai 2009, Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
>>> Thoughts? Opinions?
>>
>> It is maybe the time to redefine what's qt-copy^W kde-qt and what's 
>> his role.
>>
>> In an ideal world, everyone should just use the packaged, released Qt, 
>> just as we use others packaged libraries we depend on.
>> The reason we have qt-copy is that Qt is our biggest dependency, and a 
>> very important one, KDE rely on it. And it was a place for kde 
>> developer to publish their patches that fixes bugs that appears in 
>> KDE, or to submit patches from upstream that are really important for 
>> the stability of KDE, before a release is made.
>>
>> Anyway, regarding kde-qt:
>> What kind of patches should go there?
>> What should distributions ship?
> 
> That's my number one and only question.
> I will not end up picking patches from tree 1 2 and three and suddenly 
> discover that Suse, Madnriva, Debian, Fedora, Kubuntu and Qt Software 
> have all different Qt's because was unable to match the 
> /+kde-developers/ part
> 
> Or, in the simple sentence, who will be our Linux tree ??

Err, LINUS tree ( meaning the kernel released always come from linus git 
kernel tree )