Using reviewboard.kde.org for kde-core-devel?

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Thursday 26 March 2009, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Dijous, 26 de març de 2009, Allen Winter va escriure:
> > On Thursday 26 March 2009 5:24:56 pm Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > On Thursday 26 March 2009, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > > kde-core-devel isn't a project :-)
> > >
> > > heh .. kdelibs then? :) would at least catch those patches.
> >
> > +1
>
> reviewboard is nice, but it could be a little more usable, an explanation
> of what path is expected in "Base Diff Path:" field would hurt anyone. Also
> it would not hurt Groups being a combobox instead of a text field.

i agree; you should send these suggestions to www.review-board.org ... they 
are pretty receptive to input, ime, and the improvement between the version we 
were using last year for plasma and the new version we're using now is 
impressive. :)

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20090326/d3209a82/attachment.sig>