overhaul of some kcm appearance

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Monday 16 March 2009, Louai Al-Khanji wrote:
> While imho Qt beats the gtk/gnome stack on portability, as a whole
> KDE4 is very cumbersome in that regard. The code does compile and
> work, but actually deploying it is very difficult.

prior to kde4, it didn't even build or work properly on non-linux/unix 
platforms. and yes, that limited usage for cross platform apps and by 
developers who worked on other operating systems.

clearing the "it builds and works" hurdle, the deployment issues are obviously 
the next set of things to get under control. helping on that would be great 
appreciated, of course. i think that if a few qt devs actually helped with 
deployment issues, they'd end up saving quite a bit of development time in the 
long run by having kde libs at their disposal.

anyways, yes, the non-linux/unix portability issues were another vector of 
problems for us up until now.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20090316/0778a7ef/attachment.sig>