overhaul of some kcm appearance
notmart at gmail.com
Mon Mar 16 22:25:02 GMT 2009
On Monday 16 March 2009, Chani wrote:
> > Hmm, ok. What can we do to improve here ?
> > Do we need to improve here ?
> > Maybe (actually I hope) in a few years KDE libraries will be available
> > easily everywhere, I mean also Windows and OSX, and they will just be
> > already there. Qt being LGPL now should help a lot in this regard.
> > Or should we make it easier to build parts of kdelibs separately ?
> > Or structure kdelibs a bit like kdebase, with a set of "core" libraries
> > (kdecore, kdeui, kio, kfile), and some not so-core stuff, like e.g.
> > katepart, lkhtml, plasma, ftp and http ioslaves, kdoctools, etc. ?
> I know nothing about libraries, and maybe this is OT for the origin of this
> thread, but... would it make sense perhaps to separate plasma-theming stuff
> from the main libplasma stuff? seems like what began as "plasma" theming is
> becoming "kde-desktop" theming (as opposed to kde-application theming).
> or does that not make sense because all the desktop stuff is almost always
> going to be used with plasma-desktop anyways?
> would it hurt anything to have it more split up?
would it hurt binary compatibility? i suppose so so perhaps isn't feasible at
this point of kde4?
in this case Theme, Svg, FrameSvg and PaintUtils could make sense in a library
on their own that should be relatively small..
don't know if other parts of libplasma could be splitted as well.. perhaps the
dataengines and graphics stuff?
More information about the kde-core-devel