kdesupport/polkit-qt question

Kevin Ottens ervin at kde.org
Wed Mar 11 21:52:16 GMT 2009

On Wednesday 11 March 2009 21:23:02 Kevin Krammer wrote:
> I find it quite unsettling that something which is supposed to be a shared
> implementation across projects is so weirdly designed that it basically
> enforces the use of a single implementation.

Actually not, here's an extract from David Zeuthen's mail on the polkit-devel 
mailing list (announcing PolicyKit 0.90 pre-release):
 - There's a GObject based library to access the PolicyKit daemon, see


   with both synchronous and asynchronous functions.

   Desktop environments etc. that doesn't use GObject are encouraged to
   write their own client libraries that fit better into their object

So you're perfectly in line with him on that point.

Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
"Ni le maître sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans maître,
Ne font reculer l'ignorance."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20090311/75666c2c/attachment.sig>

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list