kdesupport/polkit-qt question

[Kevin Ottens]

On Wednesday 11 March 2009 21:23:02 Kevin Krammer wrote:
> I find it quite unsettling that something which is supposed to be a shared
> implementation across projects is so weirdly designed that it basically
> enforces the use of a single implementation.

Actually not, here's an extract from David Zeuthen's mail on the polkit-devel 
mailing list (announcing PolicyKit 0.90 pre-release):
---------------------------
 - There's a GObject based library to access the PolicyKit daemon, see

   http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/polkit-0.90/docs/

   with both synchronous and asynchronous functions.

   Desktop environments etc. that doesn't use GObject are encouraged to
   write their own client libraries that fit better into their object
   framework.
---------------------------

So you're perfectly in line with him on that point.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin 'ervin' Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
"Ni le maître sans disciple, Ni le disciple sans maître,
Ne font reculer l'ignorance."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20090311/75666c2c/attachment.sig>