KDE browser work team

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Friday 03 July 2009, David Faure wrote:
> On Thursday 02 July 2009, Adam Treat wrote:
> > oreover, modifying konq source to use an entirely different config dialog
> > if kpart != khtml strikes me as very bad idea.
>
> Sorry but this is yet another uninformed comment on the subject... The
> config dialog pages are not part of konqueror sources! They are dlopened
> kcmodules. We can easily dlopen different ones depending on the current
> part.

not to mention that kdewebkit already reads in all the relevant values from 
khtmlrc as it is. it's just where the two system diverge in 
capabilities/features that custom modules are needed.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20090703/0c14bb7e/attachment.sig>