Fate vs Bugzilla for feature tracking

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Friday 23 January 2009, Michael Leupold wrote:
> On Friday 23 January 2009 04:37:01 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > * ability to comment patches ala review board
>
> I've been having a closer look and I think it would be easiest to integrate
> reviewboard (or a similar platform) with bugzilla.
>
> The bugtracker could have a "send to review" feature which would create a
> new review and link it to the report (and vice versa). It would be great if
> additional review-related information could also be shown in the bugtracker
> (like a general status what's going on).

that would work fine for me. i don't mind multiple tools at all as long as 
they work together decently.

> We'd still have to come clean about if we want all patches to go to
> Bugzilla and how to notify everyone who might/should be interested.
> Currently most patches go to the respective mailinglists whereas the ones
> attached to Bugzilla have a smaller chance of being noticed.

review board takes care of this. as an option, it emails the project on new 
additions and changes.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20090123/1525cae7/attachment.sig>