Nepomuk as hard dependency in future?

[Alexis Ménard]

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Tobias Koenig <tokoe at kde.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 09:59:17PM +0100, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 October 2009, Volker Krause wrote:
> Hej,
>
> > > Making Nepomuk integration optional is quite difficult once you start
> to
> > > depend on it for essential features of your application though. And at
> > > least for KDE PIM, I expect that to happen. In fact, distibution list
> > > resolution already depends on it in some cases.
> >
> > We didn't have a real conclusion here.
> > So nepomuk stays optional for KDE 4.4 ?
> We need a hard dependency of nepomuk for kdepim in KDE 4.4,
> otherwise some important parts of Akonadi won't work as expected
> which will cast a damning light on Akonadi and the freshly ported
> applications... So please mark it as hard dependency finally!
>
> Ciao,
> Tobias
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAksVjpkACgkQSvFUKpY6VLC0lACbBu2MreGesmtMmRLhGh5YXvQy
> q7QAn3cbBTSQN9Yn5gxDDfdIISQADGYR
> =E5FS
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
:(

Rha again dependencies that we will need to compile by hand on embedded
platform like maemo. They don't ship redland, neither raptor packages...

But it's nice for desktop though...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20091202/aca7713f/attachment.htm>